Bear with me, because there are a few threads I would like to draw together here, and they may come together rather messily.
- I’ve had a conversation in a leadership class about the difference between actually getting things done and the activities of self-promoting squeaky wheels who don’t actually contribute. Â You know what I’m talking about, I am sure: the Peter Principal jerks who get promoted while those who labor quietly and competently get passed over.
- But then there is also the difficulty (sometimes) for management to realize who is doing what and the necessity for people to self-promote in a realistic way that helps the organization and themselves. Â If you’re doing good so subtly, is management to be blamed for missing your fingerprints on the good deeds?
- The perennial issue of libraries in general being given the shaft during bad economic times no matter how foolish that may be in terms of value for money libraries give in terms of net access, help with finding jobs, and other resources.
- The historical tendency* of librarians to want to be recognized for the good they and their institutions do by their quiet competence and effort alone.
- This post today from John Scalzi’s blog.
Which brings me to the question – are we thinking (or have we been thinking) about what we do as charity rather than a profession?
* I do realize I am oversimplifying, and I do know that libraries are getting better at promotion. Â I do think, however, that they are still behind the curve when it comes to proving the economic utility of what they do.